• Arts
  • Language Services
  • Furniture
  • Educational Services
  • Private Equity
  • Event Management
  • Nonprofit / Foundation
  • Manufacturing
  • Information Technology
  • Human Resources
  • Hotels and Restaurants
  • Health Care & Pharmaceuticals
  • Media - Broadcast and Publishing
  • Engineering / Construction
  • Food Products, Beverages and Tobacco
  • Petroleum Industry
  • Wholesale and Retail Trade
  • Travel and Leisure
  • Transporting, Moving and Warehousing
  • Telecommunications
  • Security Services
  • Real Estate
  • Marketing and Public Relations
  • Energy
  • Finance
  • Consumer Goods
  • Law Companies
  • Consultancy
  • Architecture
  • Airlines

News

CaptivesAtTheCore: The Foundation of a Risk Financing Strategy

25.05.2017
Company: MARSH, s.r.o.

This marks the 10th year that we have published an in-depth captive report. Today, global economic and political uncertainty is on the rise, and disruption from technology innovation is growing exponentially, exposing organizations to unfamiliar and sometimes unquantifiable risks. In parallel with these macro trends, more companies than ever see captive utilization as being at the core of innovative risk management strategies.

 

THE CAPTIVE LANDSCAPE – HIGHLIGHTS

 

1, Growth in captives globally

After more than 20 years of persistent growth, it is clear that the attractiveness of captives stems from an array of benefits,
not just one. As organizations’ understanding of risk matures, their risk management strategies become more sophisticated, increasing the likelihood of forming or expanding the use of a captive. Funding corporate
retained risk is a key value driver of captive formation for 62% of non-US and 74% of US Marsh-managed parents (see
Figure 2). A captive structure provides the flexibility to adjust risk retention strategies in response to market cycles or changes in exposures as a result of accelerated growth, mergers, or acquisitions. This puts the captive at the core of a risk manager’s toolbox to address traditional property/casualty risks as well as employee and customer risks.

2, The Spread Into New Geographies and Industries

Regulatory and tax considerations that fueled offshore captive formation decades ago have been either greatly
reduced or eliminated, creating a different environment for newcomers. Historically, most captives were formed
by parent companies from North America and Europe, but, over the past three years, we have seen increased interest
from emerging geographies. (“Parent companies” own the captive insurer, while a “domicile” is the country or state where
the captive is formed.)

3, Captive Structures Offer Flexibility

Captives come in many shapes and sizes and provide companies with tremendous flexibility in terms of how they structure
risk financing. While single-parent structures dominate (see Figure 11), special purpose vehicles (SPVs) are popular among banks and commercial insurers. 

More information here: 

Captives at the Core: The Foundation of a Risk Financing Strategy
 
 
 
 
 

Tags: Finance |

AmCham Corporate Patrons

x
x

Delete

Are you sure? Do you really want to delete this item?